Having worked for a council on the development side of things ā¦ thereās problems with inadequate housing, which despite people claiming they can look after themselves, comes back to bite. By ignoring or condoning them, they then claim Council has āapprovedā it, and now demand services, compensation etc. Not all Councils are unfeeling behemoths, but bitter experience is making them less willing to bend or turn a blind eye.
Thereās a group of people who want to live āfreeā, camp permanently on public land, use public toilets, make no contribution to the community. I know a few. They might be ignored, until people complain they canāt get into the public toilets for āresidentsā, the Footy Club asks to have people living in the grandstand removed. It is a big problem where I live now.
There are people who think because they own the land they can do what they want on it, regardless of the neighbours. One of the towns Council administered had a number of ātemporaryā dwellings (about a third of the town) - shipping containers, humpies, old busses, old caravans - they were loath do to anything until a complaint was lodged. Then they gave them 18 months and developed a āparkā at the race track where they could move to water & sewer if they didnāt up grade their dwelling. Most were paying only a General Rate as they claimed their land was āvacantā and not connected to services. But neighbours were sick of them using their bins, pooing in the yard, pinching their water, and jealous that while they built or bought a house, these people were living ācheapā. You could buy land for $5k, to build a house cost another $400k
Tiny houses - usually illustrated sitting in landscaped grounds - would only be economical in urban areas on tiny blocks (or tiny backyards). Councilās worry in that regard is a household with multiple tiny houses covering the backyard (a commercial enterprise) and the problems of such density and temporary services connection.
The mining boom bought these problems - to get around Boarding House regulations developers were submitting house plans for (the straw that broke the camelās back) 16 ensuited bedrooms! As one Councillor remarked, she has never met a family with 15 teenagers. It was designed to be rented by a company for worker accommodation, but disguised as a family home. Granny flat applications rose, one family requesting 5 in their backyard - again designed for rental to mine workers, not their ancestors. Then came the problems (complaints from neighbours) that each of these āGranniesā came with 2 cars plus boats, caravans, the Work 4x4 covering the footpaths & kerb on both sides of the road, blocking driveways. Council then decided that each unit would have to provide 2 car parks on the land, which then made it very difficult for families of genuine Grannies who could no longer drive.
Proving that it is a very complex question.