At a time when increasing numbers of unsophisticated users are trying to work remotely, serious flaws have been found in popular video conferencing software:
[edit 1]
And the software maker’s disclaimer is somewhat dodgy:
The United States Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Boston office also issued an alert over the rash of ZoomBombing attacks, in which uninvited people hijack video conferences, in some cases exposing themselves and/or posting obscene material.
Would probably liven up most of my work meetings.
Pro tip: Always set a password on your meetings, preferably a half decent password.
As I wrote above, critics of the legislation suggested that inevitably there would be mission creep i.e. that inevitably the retained metadata would be used for other purposes.
Inevitably.
I’m fairly certain that you can circumvent this specific problem by leaving your phone at home. Then Voda (and the other mobile carriers) will report you as being 100% compliant. So not only do you avoid that aspect of surveillance but you have a positive record showing that you have been being compliant.
And anyone who doesnt see a problem with this, needs to acquire/watch/download a fictional series called Person Of Interest. Yes, its fiction, but it remains a cautionary tale. Not so much at the start, but one or two seasons in and you start getting nervous…
Ever looked into the business end of your TV remote control and pressed a button? typically you see nothing - try looking into it with your phone camera or other digital camera and pressing a button … magic and the same principle …
Problem is that decent recognition systems can detect this also, not to mention if Inspector Plod looks at his display while following you he’ll see something very similar to the articles depiction of the camera vision - I’m not even tempted to look up whether it is against the law to obscure registration plates from human or machine vision …
No effort required. A clearly visible rego plate is the secret to successful fines from cameras as well as road patrols. Typical of each state, although the penalties vary.
The number-plate is upright and substantially parallel to the vehicle’s axles and is no more than 1.3m above ground level; and
The number-plate isn’t obscured, illegible or defaced; and
The numbers on the number-plate are clear and visible from at least 20 metres away and within an arc of 45 degrees away from the surface of the number-plate above or to either side of the vehicle; and
Any cover on the number-plate is clean, clear, untinted and flat over its whole surface, and has no reflective characteristics that would prevent the successful operation of a device approved for use under a law relating to the detection of traffic offences; and
A number-plate is affixed to the front and rear of the motor vehicle.
The rather generic second point probably nails any external device that effectively obscures, but it’s strange they go into such detail on covers and its the only one to specifically call out detection devices, I know they have a longer history … but as you note, when it comes to revenue they are usually as watertight as possible.
And how legal. In Queensland there was a crackdown on filtering/reflecting number plate covers few years ago with fines issued. Obscuring a number plate in any way is an offense in Qld (and assume it is the same in other states).
In June 2018, we were driving home behind a Commodore sedan for around 7km when the sun started to hit his rear number plate producing a series of blinding flashes which momentarily blinded me.
I reported it to the Transport Dept and provided a video clip from the GoPro with the audio removed for obvious resaons.
Correct. That’s what I meant by “specific” and “that aspect of surveillance”.
We already have facial recognition covered. Refer Insane Clown Posse above.
For vehicle number plate surveillance, you will need to take public transport and use an unregistered travel card.
Or you could just #StayHome !
In this case, you don’t want to do that. You want the public record to show that “you” were at home at all times.
I’m not an expert but I believe that a Faraday cage is better at blocking the outside (prevent phone from receiving) than blocking the inside (prevent phone from transmitting). So in theory phone surveillance might still work. It depends in part on whether the surveillance relies on the completion of any kind of handshake - assuming 100% effective screening of anything being received by the phone but a somewhat leaky screening of anything being transmitted by the phone. The handshake may be important because otherwise the detection of the phone may be unauthenticated and hence able to be forged.
The warrant used by Australian Federal Police officers to search the home of News Corp journalist Annika Smethurst last year has been thrown out by the High Court, but police will be allowed to keep the materials they seized in the raid. (my emphasis)
The Commonwealth had asked the High Court to find it should be allowed to keep the material, even if it was obtained illegally.
I wish I could argue that. Yes, officer, most of my income this year was obtained illegally but I would like to be able to keep it.