The current state of our airlines. The ‘regulators’ appear to be disinterested as any action might impact profits or perhaps donations? In contrast the US is considering what amounts to a pax bill of rights and airline responsibilities - dry reading, excerpt below.
The state of play here is, with the article going well beyond the bylined delay, with similar tales reported daily.
For those not clicking through the US proposal is
Among other things, the bill requires the Department of Transportation to implement regulations relating to
protections for airline passengers from being required to involuntarily relinquish their seats, unless necessary for safety or security;
the elimination of the dollar limitations on compensation to passengers denied boarding due to overbooking;
compensation to passengers for delayed or cancelled flights;
interline agreements between air carriers and other transportation providers;
training on the rights of passengers;
unreasonable air carrier fees;
unrestricted access of consumers to information on schedules, fares, fees, and taxes;
accuracy in pricing of tickets and disclosure of lowest fares; and
notifications to passengers of their rights and eligibility for refunds.
The Federal Aviation Administration must (1) prohibit any air carrier from reducing seat size or leg room, and (2) report on the quality of food and potable water on passenger aircraft and the sufficiency of flight crews and aircraft.
The bill provides a private right of action for passengers aggrieved by airline actions and increases civil penalties on air carriers for violations of passenger protections.
Just as well, otherwise Qantas and Co might be lucky to be left with a second hand Twin Otter.
With nearly everything either leased or contracted out, there is probably very little to be had?
‘Qantas Airways (QAN.AX) - Net Assets
A counterbalance to the lack of consumer protections appears to be the airline protections for gates that Qantas Group and Virgin enjoy at Mascot. It remains to be discovered what if anything will change when Badgers Creek opens, but the Melbourne impact of Avalon as a foil for Tullamarine has been mostly nil.
Pax want to fly from a convenient location and Melbourne’s population is central to and east of Tulla while Avalon is off to the west, neither having good transport options. How will Badgers Creek fare with the population concentrations or will international traffic gravitate there?
So long as Qantas/Jetstar and Virgin control gates and thus pax options at major airports we cynics can confidently punt fares will remain what the market will bear delivering service to what the market will accept.