For buildings is unlikely they will split insurance between domestic and commercial areas, as it will be difficult/impossible to delineate boundaries between the two uses (e.g. walls, ceiling, roof, services, common areas). Building and legal liability insurance, like that which would have been sought, would cover all the building. They won’t split it as it then could open a situation where two different insurers/underwriters insure same parts of the building…or don’t insure these parts to remove their own liability. A situation no one would want to be in.
We have a situation similar to your own where we have both domestic dwelling and commercial buildings at the same premises. A few years ago, our insurance, due to change in activities, was reassessed from residential use to commercial use. This resulted in an over doubling of the premium (for building, contents and business insurance). Our own broker has indicated that it is impossible to split premium costs associated with the dwelling and commercial uses as there is many areas where there is an overlap of or common uses. When insurance is assessed, it is based on the replacement value of all the assets and legal liability risk. There could also be legal, windows and other provisions within the premium. Some of these applying to dwelling units, and some to commercial activities.
As outlined above, the insurance (particularly for legal liability) will be based on the highest risk. The highest risk will be retail/commercial activities. The premiums will reflect this risk. It won’t be possible to separate out legal liability risk as the commercial risk includes the domestic risk. They aren’t calculated separately. This is why I indicated to see if
negotiate the weighting of the premium so the landlords for the retail units pay a higher proportion than those for dwelling units.
A broker might be able to provide a rule of thumb type metric to be used for such purpose. Assigning weightings so commercial pay a higher proportion of the premium to reflect higher legal liability risk would need agreement of all landlords and also agreement in relation to the metric used.
Note: It would be possible to get separate contents/business insurance, but this is an individual choice of each unit occupier. But this isn’t the insurance at hand.
Just in relation to cost of the insurance. If they have used a good broker, it is unlikely going alone you will get much of a better deal using your own broker. We have found ourselves that the brokers tend to go to the same underwriters and premium costs are very similar.
Where you may save money is not having to pay for the strata managers service fees for arranging the insurance. Depending on this fee, it may be reasonable if you need to spend your own valuable time getting quotes, preparing questionnaire and responding to queries. A unit owner would also need to nominate their responsibility to do this on behalf of all unit owners.
There has also been much media about the increase in 2022 to insurance premiums. This is partly due to natural disasters which have occurred and increased building costs (labour and materials). I haven’t received a quote for next years insurance, but we anticipate a significant increase in the 2022 premiums.
Is this documented in the AGM minutes and actions agreed to what improvements were required? This should be done if one wants improvement as it provides a measure to compare performance against. Where actions are not fulfilled, it gives grounds for termination… including breaking a service agreement.