There are many, I decided to turn off flash in the browser on Friday and after about 5 minutes had to turn it back on as a number of websites the content would not be shown. The only one I can remember was BOM where radar images need flash.
1 Like
Flash has been disabled on my computer for quite a while - or at least so I thought. I revisited my browser settings and it was enabled! That has now been corrected - although the browser only provides for āask firstā.
The BOM radar image seems to work fine without Flash - but the Bureau needs to fix its websiteās lack of security. (There were a couple of locations where it was impossible to know whether it was working, such as Longreach. Of course this is simply because of a lack of interesting weather there.)
4 Likes
I donāt know whether thatās the right Section to settle the question, but for clarity ā¦
s51(xxxi) applies only to the Commonwealth government, not to state governments.
So you canāt directly compare the Commonwealth compulsorily acquiring an asset with a state compulsorily acquiring an asset.
So āThe Castleā was about an airport, not a suburban road.
The situation if a territory were to compulsorily acquire an asset on unjust terms could be more complex. As you say, the Commonwealth has the right (the power) to step in and override the injustice but I would take additional convincing that the Commonwealth has an obligation to step in - and Section 51 (xxxi) still doesnāt directly apply to a territory government.
I didnāt intend to muddy the waters by talking about territories. The intention was to contrast Commonwealth and state.
2 Likes
State Govts responses are mainly derived from application of Common Law. They are not always fair and so hope is based on an outcome that may be better in that Stateās Supreme Court. As you rightly point out it is a State only matter but the land will still be acquired. Compensation is not always made and this is what caused the Supreme Court action over the rail corridor which the litigant failed to sway the Court to get the Govt to pay compensation.
In the Castle they retained their land, while this made a great film the underlying point was that the Fed Govt could not acquire the land. This is not true, the only requirement was that fair compensation was made, and the Courts have held that market value at the time is fair. I should have made it clearer that the Constitution applies to Fed Govt responsibilities and this is which gives a protection of fair compensation in Federal acquisitions. I have amended my previous post to make it more evident.
3 Likes
Also very clearly spelt out in the respective Commonwealth Land Acquisitions Act 1989 (LAA).
https://www.finance.gov.au/sites/default/files/2019-12/compulsory-acquisition-of-land-brochure.pdf
Interesting points on acquisition,
Of interest is the CofA can exercise itās rights without agreement, and subsequent to acquisition settle the fair value. Responsibility for the Act rests with the Dept of Finance and Minister.
History of one sample:
With reference to State Govts (EG Qld) our physical property tittles had references on the rear reserving specific rights to the Crown. Our conveyancing solicitor explained they were on all freehold titles, and indicated the crown could at any time reclaim the title or exercise other rights.
In the 1960ās a local council used that authority to resume a large parcel of urban land (farm) from a family member. Adequate compensation was considered the unimproved value on the rates notice at the time. This was many times less than market value of the day, and was not contestable. Subsequent re-zoning saw the land substantially converted from public purpose (the legal justification required for the acquisition) and sold to development for premium housing lots. Weāve come a long way with Qld now rating properties based on market value on the day, and compensation including the value of improvements. The significant land acquisition costs incurred for the ex Traverston Crossing Dam project on the Mary River bear witness to this.
3 Likes
Another day another attempt to further develop the desire of Govts to know all about all their citizens. The Facial Recognition system is going to be further rolled out in the Federal Govtās stable of Departments that deal with clients (hereās 
looking at you MyGov) . Some are warning a step possibly too far with the concern that implementation isnāt what it should be.
4 Likes
So people on unemployment benefits will need to use their mobile phone camera to confirm who they are? And this will work fine in remote communities, of courseā¦?
If you have nothing to hide you have no reason not to allow your face to be recorded in a centralised government database that will of course be as well protected as all the other information said government holds on you which will all be in that one place that is not at all attractive to hackers.
(Slightly paraphrased.)
3 Likes
No argument from me of your between the lines concerns as well as your written ones. I have no great love for any intrusion that these Govts today make towards depriving us of liberty, privacy, and their desire for overall control of every step we take.
1 Like
Clothing company H & M fined 35.3 million euros for spying on their employees.
2 Likes
Data Breach too since:
The privacy violation was discovered after the data briefly became visible to all people on the company network
Great ā¦
1 Like
An article regarding whether the State Premiers are actually telling the truth.
And another one claiming that some of them are not.
As the old saying goes. āHow do you tell when a politician is lying?ā
āYou can see their lips movingā.
3 Likes
An article regarding claims that the AEC is investigating whether Labor supplied electoral data to unions.
The interesting part is not the claims but that the ABC News does not know the correct word for electoral rolls.
1 Like
It appears to also be a problem an nine.com.au
āRoovesā?
I am apparently archaic, as while I generally do not use the word I consider it acceptable English.
Oh, and my browser (with a bunch of privacy extensions) almost totally refuses to load that Nine News page. Good to see all is working correctly.
5 Likes
Nine now has a news page? a real news page? since when? 
ā¦ and as it pertains to roo{f|v}ing -
4 Likes
A book touting story, but.
3 Likes
Whether companies are a bigger threat or a smaller threat than governments is bit beside the point.
The threats add together.
The threats are also not independent e.g. government buying data from companies and/or government leaning on companies for data and/or government legislating to force companies to cough up data.
1 Like
An article regarding a small sample poll by The Guardian finds overwhelming support for a Federal ICAC.
3 Likes
I am not sure if it should be the same as the NSW ICAC, but a separate, independent body which investigates complaints and misconduct within the Commonwealth. Maybe the Qld CCC model is a better one.
5 Likes
Perhaps, but the Commonwealth proposal is even better? At protecting politicians from public scrutiny in the opinion of some. First comments.
Apparently what we donāt get to hear about canāt hurt us.
No public enquires into politicians behaving badly?
Investigations can only be initiated at the request of the government/minister?
Still itās only a draft. Plenty of time over 6 months to fine tune the legislation to silky perfection. 
3 Likes
