Received a phishing email on my icloud account today. Here’s what it looked like, so if you use Apple at all, do be careful and dont click links. Its been forwarded to reportphishing@apple.com
My car has a SIM. When I took delivery it was almost like having a new PC with the myriad settings and data sharing and T&C agreements. It periodically requires me to reconfirm or change what data I am willing to share with the manufacturer’s system. In return it provides real time traffic, map updates, system updates, etc. Data sharing can vary from none to almost everything. It seems rudimentary compared to what Ford is doing.
Interesting, and a bit of an aside. It might also affect the other obvious such as warranty.
Both our vehicles have stickers attached by the tyre company that provided the last replacement. This details pressure settings that are different to the handbook recommendation.
I’d guess the insurer and vehicle importer also need to know. Will they share nicely?
It might be simpler to just use an Uber, wear a clown mask and pay cash. (2 out of 3 are doable)
For a start, it means that even if you leave your mobile phone at home, you are still being tracked for that part of the journey that is done in the car - even if you avoid a myriad of cameras and toll sensors.
I think this is a bad direction to be going in but I suppose the government will do nothing (they are part winners, part of the problem) and manufacturers will foist it upon us.
How long before you void your warranty unless you consent to keeping the car online to the manufacturer?
Don’t you need an app / account for that? Let’s assume that the car used by the Uber driver itself has the latest in tracking technology.
It seems impossible for the modern world to function without. I suspect I was being a little cheeky. Even wearing a funny mask and paying cash is no assurance of anonymity. You also risk exposure through being so conspicuous.
Many give up so much information. Mostly to invisible foreign businesses, and with hardly a concern for the outcome because we get something (access to a service, trinkets?) in return. Have we reached the point where the only choice remaining is with which enterprise/s we will be sharing our life’s data?
The government up to its old tricks, expanding the surveillance state.
Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Amendment Bill 2020
One fun item, among many:
34FF Involvement of lawyers
Removal of lawyer for disrupting questioning
13(6) If the prescribed authority considers the lawyer’s conduct is unduly disrupting the questioning of the subject, the prescribed authority may direct a person exercising authority under the warrant to remove the lawyer from the place where the questioning is occurring.
Can’t have those pesky lawyers holding the government and its agencies to account.
I thought ASIO was currently permitted to question subjects without a lawyer being present - so this might involve a slight improvement on current requirements.
Of course, the devil is in the details, and I am not likely to read all of them.
My first exposure to software that monitored web activity and email correspondence in the workplace dates back nearly 20 years. Sys Admins have had access to various tools to observe activities directly on internal networks for much longer, but it was time consuming in comparison.
Some may now ask, have we reached the bottom of the barrel?
Time and motion assessment, 21st century version. Hopefully it dies a quick death, like it’s 20th century predecessor. Reliability and quality of outcomes count?
I was the same and if anyone works in the public sector or big business and used their resources (computer, smartphones, remote access) to access the internet, it will be monitored and controlled/restricted.
Inductions, HR meetings and refresher training on security, employment agreements/policy and IT changes (such as new systems) all provided reminders of appropriate use of provided resources. We were also told of disciplinary action should one chose to flout the rules.
Occasionally when going to a benign website, the internet security ‘marshall’ software would pop up saying that its system had detected access to the particular website and the access had been logged. The first few times and calls to the IT service desk revealed the ‘marshall’ was not fully perfect and recorded the occasional false positive access. After a while one ignored such automatic notifications when the arose and one was doing the right thing.
I have a friend who does WFH quite frequently as a normal part of his week, he has several computers, one of which is work only. Anyone using a work computer for other purposes is crazy.
We didnt have anything like that. Basically internet access was almost totally restricted to half a dozen sites that someone in admin decided would be suitable. There was an assumption that “everyone” would be accessing everything else for nefarious purposes. This was NSW Health. Interestingly prior to everything being locked down, the only person who did (and was sacked for his trouble) was someone in admin. Everyone else was too busy working to bother. You had to put in a request for any site to be unlocked. I asked for WebMD to be allowed, and was refused. However, one of the allowed sites was a local engineering site. Turned out that all requests from the lower echelons, and especially nurses, were refused as a matter of course. There was an assumption that no nurse could be trusted to just do their work and research as needed… clearly they would all be accessing youtube and porn etc etc etc.