Compulsory labeling for GMO food

There is no evidence that GMOs are harmful & informing the public will just lead to, ill-informed, consumers wanting them banned.
Feeding an increasing population will require more GMO work, particularly with climate change.
Consuming a “fish gene” in wheat is not an issue, as people consume that same gene when they eat fish. We also share over 50% of our genes with a banana, & we don’t think we’re eating humans when eating fruit.
The calling for labelling is a non issue.
It’ll just lead to similar campaigns like the “Food Babe” championed in the USA, where she claimed ingredients that were in yoga mats were in food. Technically true, as the ingredient she claimed was an issue is in every plant cell on earth, so it would be in food. It doesn’t make it dangerous.

2 Likes