TPG, NBN Slow Speed Offer

Somewhere recently I read that the average cost for a fibre connection was around $4500. The highest cost to a single dwelling for a fttp connection prior to moving to fttn was just under $50k. As we now know the taxpayer will ultimately be paying for the network (either through government subsidies to support the nbn or through connection costs), the question could be asked if this is the best use of taxpayers money (in effect removing the money from the economy for one infrastructure project)?

I am not sure if the economic benefit to residential premise of $4500 will ever be recouped, unless the house has a home based business which which relies on high speed connections. I see medium to large businesses will benefit from high speed connections, but they have the funds to pay for such connections.

It would have been good if a business case was prepared before launching into the nbn project, as we (the taxpayer) could have made more informed decisions on the real benefits, opportunity costs and disadvantages of the nbn. Instead we rely on politicians of every persuasion, (who know not much about networks) to make uninformed/uneducated decisions, posssibly for their own political interests. As a result, we get the current nbn.

1 Like

My current ISP for Naked DSL has advised me to “wait and see” also when I tackled them about poor speeds and high costs of fibre to the node being offered (pushed) in my area. His terminology was “wait until after the teething problems have been sorted out”
Six of the eighteen months have passed (I have until January 2019 before the copper wires get disconnected from ADSL at the local exchange). There are still no node cabinets in my street, but there are three cabinets in the next street so I fear there is quite a length of copper wire involved in any current FTTN offers.
Meanwhile although my DSL speeds aren’t quite as good as Gandoes I am paying $70 per month for Naked DSL, 200 GB, VoIP per month.

2 Likes

This might be a good fill-in for where that came from, what it means, and some comparative numbers.

3 Likes

As @PhilT linked to above the $4500 connection fee has been trotted out endlessly by the Govt & NBN Co. This is even used for areas that have Fibre cabling that feeds the Node out front of premises. Largely this was an initial cost of connecting a home to FTTP. But around the world in places such as the US, Canada, Singapore, NZ, the UK and myriad EU sites the real cost has dropped very substantially with US costs at about AU$2200 and NZ about AU$2400.

If talking population density, well yes the cost to connect a property in say the Simpson desert area would be extremely costly but NBN Co uses this very scenario to establish the average $4K cost using the Australian Average population data of approx 3 people per square kilometre. No one at this time is asking everyone to have a run of Fibre to their premises and it was always envisaged that some areas would for a long time be served by Fixed Wifi and Satellite.

Reality speaking here now is that most of the Australian population is close to or in major or substantial cities and towns (any town around 1,000 persons or greater was considered able to have Fibre). Somewhat of a larger cost to install Fibre was also so that large and dense Urban areas would have a higher cost than actual to subsidise the less densely populated areas so that their costs were lower than actual (equitable access).

NBN Co currently state that the cost is still $4500 so that when they discuss FTTC (Fibre to the Curb) at $2200 it looks so good for their new preferred method and people get sucked into this huge difference. Admittedly it is cheaper to use the last little bit of copper to the home to make the connection (around 70 metres or so) as no new conduit to the home has to be run nor does the fibre have to be run to the home. But FTTC still has some maturing to do, it is still being tested and FTTP is very mature tech. Ultimately FTTP has far greater capacity than FTTC to carry data and if you want (and you should want to) future proof your communications the initial outlay of fibre to the premises will be, and is, worthwhile as a national asset.

2 Likes

It could have been expected that average fttp connection costs over time may reduce due to efficiencies and economies of scale (spreading fixed costs such as contractor establishment, equipment depreciation, hardware purchases etc across greater number of connections).

The cost from the node to the premises could be less than the pre-fttn installation costs (assuming average $4500), as the upstream m of the jodes has alreadh been completed. However with establishment costs and gaining necessary approvals and permits (such as thise from councils) to work in road reserves for one connection, running fibre from the node to the premises could be similar to the $4500 average or less for simple extensions from the node to the residence (could be more, could be less). There is even chance that it could cost significantly more for longer or more difficult connections such as existing copper is not laid in conduits fully from the node to the premises (it is likely that the last street copper joint box to the premises would not be conduit and excavation would be required from this box to the wall of the premises).

I also understand thatn some of the high connection costs were due to connection to heritage listed residences, where additional approvals/consent/special design was required for the connection (as the heritage listing prohibitied any physical damage to the homes).

Irrespective of that, if the average cost is still several thousands for the node to residence fibre run. Something most residents won’t be able to afford and potentially need in the short to medium term.

2 Likes

That almost reads like support for most of our governments who think long term planning is anything beyond the next election, and short term planning is to the next poll. Business and major infrastructure projects require 10-20 year horizons. Therein lies the problem. One can plan ahead or remain behind the curve in a reactive mode.

3 Likes

The cost of fitting to the home in US and NZ and others are still cheaper even with the same requirements we have here to fit Fibre to homes that only ever had copper to the premises. Don’t think that these costs/problems are not seen by other countries. In particular the US has many similar issues to ours including sparse population density areas yet they can do the fitout fair cheaper than we can (about a 50% discount on our cost).

Single residence fitouts in all places in the world can be costly if there are special requirements, but they are few in relation to the bulk of fitouts that occur. Yet with even those the average cost worldwide (in developed countries) is far less than we are being told they are here. Again I stress this is because NBN Co use a density of 3 people per sq kilometre as the basis for their costings.

2 Likes

Just an update regarding TPG.

Coincidentally, (maybe?) 2 days after first posting here I received a phone call from a TPG salesperson telling me that I was a priority customer and that I should sign up to their new NBN plan as soon as possible. It took me a good 10 minutes to explain to the salesperson that I was happy with my current ADSL2+ connection and wouldn’t be connecting to the NBN for the 18 month “grace” period because I would lose speed for the same price they are currently charging me. It took awhile to convince them of my logic.

I asked the salesperson to make a note on my file to not contact me again regarding switching to their NBN. I would contact them when I was ready. they agreed to my request.

I have since received 3 more phone calls from 3 new / different TPG sales people urging me to do the same. Each time I have asked them to note on my file I do not want to be contacted or switched to NBN without my further input. I am getting a bit sick of this unwanted pressure…

Anyone experience the same? Or have any idea why TPG feels the need to apply so much pressure to an existing customer to switch to the NBN so quickly? Why the rush?

1 Like

While NBN prices are governed by a healthy component of CVC costs, it makes me wonder if there are some hidden bonuses for moving people over. Another possibility is that there is some technical effort, however small, to switch a customer over and they don’t want a rush at the 18 months mark. Or TPG is just sloppy and uses untrained undisciplined boiler room sales staff who get commissions on each ‘sale’. (No punts required on which is most likely.)

1 Like

As @PhilT notes/surmises there is a bit of a process in the switch. In the old ADSL switch in the exchange it was a single point for a Tech to switch from one provider to another. Now with FTTN they have nodes which a Tech must visit to complete the switch. Some similar approaches needed with Fixed Wifi (fitting the dish and ports), HFC (fitting the modem and cabling in the house as distinct from the outside hardware), FTTP (fitting the internal cabling and hardware) and FTTC (requires a connection to the DPu in the pit or on post and disconnecting the copper past the pit to exchange), FTTB (requires a switch over in the Telcom cabinet).

This requires a Tech to complete up to two disconnects, one in the exchange, one possibly nearer the premises. It also requires a further effort to complete the connection. This all takes time and may involve contractors/employees from two businesses to complete, NBN are responsible for the hardware to the house but inside fittings are done by contractors to the Telco (RSP).

Getting an NBN appointment that is on time and date can be like drawing teeth with no painkillers. If that appointment doesn’t happen the other contractor cannot complete their job and so they have to reschedule (almost ad infinitum).

If you don’t switch this creates extra work in the “waiting period” as two types of tech have to be supported in the area until cutoff day. Most RSPs hope to achieve the switchover as soon as possible while NBN staff are still allocated to the area (speeds up the switch). Then there is the issue of crosstalk between copper in the pole between ADSL and NBN, meaning NBN connections are unable to run at the best speeds for the area until the ADSL is removed.

So RSPs are keen to get it done and bonuses for sales could be part of that, but they always note it can take 30 days to get the connection to NBN. During this you may have no connection to any service (and if there is a problem it can be months) and that (perhaps extended) period may not have any coverage by CSG depending on your provider.

4 Likes

Don’t blame Canberra for the politicians you send there!

You too!

3 Likes

I see Canberra as a place created artificially to store them, and their minions, a bit like a Golgafrinchan Ark ship of sorts, but for those folk. We’ve just got to work out how the launch the whole of Canberra into deep space … :wink:

2 Likes

You know, real people live in Canberra and work in Canberra. The quality of some of that work is determined by the terrible politicians you keep sending here, but don’t blame us for your poor choices!

Unfortunately the only choices we have (yourself included) are politicians, so a more cynical person than I could argue that by definition only poor choices can be made - of course I’d agree with that person … Maybe a benevolent dictatorship would work if it included a vision beyond the next term.

Only partly true. Sadly, the numpties in misgovt only got there coz there were sufficient clueless &/or immoral xenophobic Luddite numpties in the electorate who put them there.

Maybe, but to anyone drawing breath, with eyes+ears operational, & >3.5 functional neurons, the myth of fraudband was completely exposed long before that fed elect. Yet enough dopes still voted-in these miscreants.

Bingo !! That is it in a nutshell. They could not have waged their war on technology, science, education, asylum seekers, refugees, climate, biodiversity, unemployed, underemployed, youth, pensioners, First Australians, etc, from the Opposition benches.

2 Likes

Run a bit more hot water would you, Number One.

Just watch out for the giant mutant star goat.

Ha, if only we could get them all infected from a dirty telephone… :wink:

1 Like

If my retailer was keen to get it done then it would answer the simple question “In which node cabinet is my copper wire going to be connected to the fibre network, so that retailer can estimate realistic speed range according to the distance and thus “sell” appropriate speed plan?”
But they will not address that basic question, despite my asking it repeatedly, via various channels.

1 Like

The RSP may not know which Node will be your’s as NBNCo is quite closed lip about this. Best bet is to try to contact the NBNCo about what node may be yours but don’t expect an answer. The map that was provided in another topic but again linked here might be of some use but is not updated frequently…even they say to contact NBNCo for an official response.

http://nbnmtm.australiaeast.cloudapp.azure.com/nbnmtm.html

I still stand by the “So RSPs are keen to get it done”. Choose to go basic speed eg 25/5 and upgrade in steps eg 50/20 next and see how each speed tier reflects in actual performance before moving to a higher tier. Most RSPs will happily accommodate these steps. It won’t take too long before you know which tier is appropriate for your location.

Part of the reason for RSPs being reluctant to give a figure for speed is they got caned by the ACCC over selling speed packages that clients could not ever get, partly this reflects what tech you get connected on eg FTTP, FTTN, FTTC, Fixed Wireless and if anything copper or “wireless”, the state of the copper between your house and the node or DPu, line of sight issues and similar. Only after you are connected can they really determine line or site conditions more accurately.

3 Likes