I bought a seaweed bar shampoo in Wales last year and have been using it and find my hair feels cleaner. I don’t use a conditioner with it and agree about the tangles but use a wide toothed comb which helps. My son and daughter in law visited from the UK over Christmas and brought me another 2 bars which will probably last about a year.
I was washing my hair every couple of days, now it can last an extra day. I haven’t tried any of the bar shampoos that are on sale in Australia. The brand I use is only available by mail order in the UK.
Good to see a review of solid bar shampoos. I’ve started using solid shampoos/conditioners to avoid plastic bottles. I’m amazed by the results. I have very thick shoulder length hair, and it’s never been better, and seems to require less washing than previously. I used some Ethique samplers which were very good, and then tried Lush bars, which I love. A bar costs about $15, but is supposed to last the same as 3 bottles of shampoo. The conditioner would last even longer. Your hair feels tangly and weird at first, not as sleek and easily combed out as with bottled product, so use a flexible bristle brush for detangling to make it easier. And the lovely scent lasts for days!
It would be useful if Choice reviewed hair conditioners for different hair types*, especially since you don’t appear to have done these before.
Also I agree with others that Choice is overdue for an update on reviews of hair shampoos. Both types of products are subject to lots of marketing hype - with associated extreme pricing - particularly targeting women.
I am a skeptic but would like a decent, ethical and green product and prepared to pay for it - but only if it works and lives up to their ethical and green claims.
Hair types should include oily, normal and dry/damaged hair.
I have moved your post to an earlier thread to join others with the same request. Good luck with your request. @requestatest
There is another thread you can look at in relation to Shampoo ethical ratings, though if I remember correctly the rating was for the business and not for the product.