On Thursday I went to Woolworths and bought two loaves of multi-seed grain sliced bread based on the label photographed. The bread looked the same as the others, but had an additional circular yellow sticker on it which showed it was low GI.
I was in a hurry, so only checked the register docket when I got home. I had been charged $6 for the two loaves instead of the $5 I was expecting.
The next day I went back and talked to the customer service person who checked with the bakery only to be told that the $6 was correct even though the loaves were WW sliced 750g.
Unsatisfied, I went up to the bakery, and talked to the ‘baker’ in charge. His explanation was that the bread I bought from a higher shelf was low GI bread, and was not included in the pricing on the label. He agreed that the low GI bread was a WW sliced loaf variety 750-800g, but insisted the low GI bread was different.
I asked him to show me where it said that the low GI was excluded, and his response was that the pricing only applied to the bread below the sticker not above the sticker and the low GI bread was different.
After pointing out that it was deceptive advertising and going around in circles a couple of times, it was apparent that he was a doer and not a thinker, and had no clue about consumer law. So I left to do the rest of my shopping.
Ironically, the bread there including the low GI bread in contention had been marked down to $1.95 a loaf, so I grabbed a couple more.
What do others think? Is the extra low GI label enough to exclude it, or should the low GI bread have been charged at the advertised rate?