Woah there. As someone who occasionally fixes Wikipedia, it does not ‘comment’ - it either provides information based upon reliable secondary sources (primary sources are very much frowned upon) or devolves into name-calling and edit wars. (There is a separate ‘Talk’ page per Wikipedia entry - which will largely tell you how contentious that entry is.)
The Ecosia page has apparently been somewhat controversial from time to time - including for its use of primary sources.
This claim was removed from Wikipedia, as it was only from a primary source (the company’s website).
Here endeth today’s Wikipedia lesson.
